War of 1812 :: essays research papers

earth-closet Marshall was Chief Justice in many a(prenominal) early cases that would help get the Supreme Court up to the aim of billet and equal amount of say as the other branches. His regnant in the first few important cases helped bring the Courts uses of Judicial reassessment up to balance the powers. John Q. Adams, son of John Adams and he was the leader behind the signing of the treaty of Ghent. Daniel Webster was the great spokesperson of the North as well as a warhawk. He was also very prone to the Union. Henry Clay was known as the great compromiser and helped to put together and organize the Missouri Compromise, he was kind of the middle man who suggested compromises in the midst of the north and the south. He is also known for his American System, which improved banking systems, tariffs, roads, and canals. John C. Calhoun was the spokesman of the south and was also a warhawk. He was responsible for the writing of the " to the south Carolina Exposition".T he McCulluh vs. Maryland was a case when Maryland wanted to be able to tax the Bank of the United States of America. Because of this privilege that they wanted they would consent the power to tax this Bank out of existence. Marshall did not retard this as necessary therefore did not grant Maryland power to do so. Gibbons vs. Ogden was a case when New York granted a monopoly to a private company owner of a ferry company between the two States of New York and New Jersey. The monopoly was not valid in the secernate of New Jersey therefore it gave the court Judicial Review all over inter demesne commerce and was turned down. Fletcher vs. Peck was a case when the atomic number 31 legislature was influenced by bribery and granted 35 million dry land in the Yazoo River country to private speculators. The case was turned down because the domain laws were not allowed to tamper with the contracts. Dartmouth College vs. Woodward was a case when a college was chartered by the King of Engl and New Hampshire wanted to change the contract that the King had do out. Dartmouth won the case because of private property rights as well as enhancing judicial review. Cohens vs. Virginia was a case when Cohens was selling illegal lottery tickets and was implant guilty by the Virginia court and Cohens argument was the monopoly that was granted to the state was unconstitutional.